- From: Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:00:58 +0000
- To: Robert Fuller <robert.fuller@deri.org>
- Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Robert, Thanks for the response, good to hear from an implementor. On 5 November 2010 10:41, Robert Fuller <robert.fuller@deri.org> wrote: > ... > However... with regard to publishing ontologies, we could expect > additional overhead if same content is delivered on retrieving different > Resources for example http://example.com/schema/latitude and > http://example.com/schema/longitude . In such a case ETag could be used > to suggest the contents are identical, but not sure that is a practical > solution. I expect that without 303 it will be more difficult in > particular to publish and process ontologies. This is useful to know thanks. I don't think the ETag approach works as it's intended to version a specific resource, not be carried across resources. One way to avoid the overhead is to strongly recommend # URIs for vocabularies. This seems to be increasingly the norm. It also makes them easier to work with (you often want the whole document) L. -- Leigh Dodds Programme Manager, Talis Platform Talis leigh.dodds@talis.com http://www.talis.com
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 13:01:33 UTC