- From: Mischa Tuffield <mmt04r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:47:45 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|a0cc3a2d93ccb47604f24271c4222fa0mA4BnA06mmt04r|ecs.soton.ac.uk|715BD9CF-9>
On 4 Nov 2010, at 23:32, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 11/4/10 6:48 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> On 4 November 2010 23:24, Kingsley Idehen<kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >>> On 11/4/10 5:09 PM, Mischa Tuffield wrote: >>> >>> Drawing an analogy, this email is signed, I am not signed, the email has a >>> uri identifying the person which sent, and they are quite different. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Mischa *2 [cents|pence] worth >>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Nathan >>>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) >>> >>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJM0yETAAoJEJ7QsE5R8vfvsQoQALCxpsT7wfjSHLIiYsHCuf/8 >>> KSXHqMMUBiHNJyc8asFyfA9+CGMOM3r3b/kmF5KNPmg49RB9bon5Jlb5fiCvBr5J >>> TXYk+5s7iFpLENzhWhDJhCpIX8ZC/HBXDJ/Vpkjijesa3W+5dL/G+4RHYXCpUTi1 >>> Rwc6FA57pZTb1NnKgmEdK6jCO4sZBhdkyCKaWwlvK1zig07XdP1/CVmblGWpaSuc >>> oXJZ9cUf0gKnwI4NDO7B/PjgvfMH7/8pWVPx56f68rk/fnXaOB0aWbxCwuIuDeL/ >>> obzLU1i7oxjnKD4TMdH+bULJAnZvndyLWPRJBorhfJQqfnvV9xAJGTWAWxf4G5Xh >>> r5iHA5FsLIw1GFBuMhWHVsFXtuDhCXrXzWxOTlSPGx43/bIZtXeQbTXcbUvI5zGU >>> RAU6etCOFuCEo46H+i0T5yJfUz0OhwjYNBSIqIZq/FDpt9rkCKNavXIhRmazKCoI >>> l7Lh5zouk9UH+wuKfE4Z0yAbXDTgobmbqcZzKzBXgzx9B8haYuCEKXcbmBbWIt2h >>> +p2OkAEBfngZZMtz2Wi5WQWE/dgv0cPjX19y9sHcXpaop6i9kFArQeCuYb/p+6fr >>> G1FnjZYTOKWex9eQd88oxzlisFafyU8cgTX2VxEdiH6Ko7yD1wdhyAw8KYegEnL+ >>> 4O+cZmx+6w0HQNwM2T5D >>> =Q5HZ >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> >>> Misca, >>> >>> Nice of you to bring this up, I've changed topic heading accordingly. >>> >>> Now imagine if your signature also included your WebID. Then my email client >>> would verify your mails using the WebID protocol :-) >>> >>> Another example of the power of Linked Data! >> Do you even need your WebID in your signature? Nah, don't think it is needed ... > > No, not really. Got wires a little crossed, too much multi tasking today, even by my standards :-) > > I should be able to verify the sender of the a signed email by verifying the public key in my possession which boils down to S/MIME + WebID tweak. Thus, removing CA dependency by allowing self-signed certs. >> What if your WebID pointed to your PGP credentials? > > That too, and will ultimately be on of the options, I suspect. I have that stated in my foaf file [1], using the WOT ontology [2], stating that my WebID [3] is the identity of my PGP credentials. [1] http://mmt.me.uk/foaf.rdf [2] http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/ [3] http://mmt.me.uk/foaf.rdf#mischa Best, Mischa > > > Kingsley >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen >>> President& CEO >>> OpenLink Software >>> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >>> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >>> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 11:49:54 UTC