- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:17:55 +0000
- To: joel sachs <jsachs@csee.umbc.edu>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, nathan@webr3.org, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, Pete Johnston <Pete.Johnston@eduserv.org.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:04:44 -0500 (EST) joel sachs <jsachs@csee.umbc.edu> wrote: > I think we can, though we might not be properly understood, e.g. > "Kingsley was great in Gandhi and Sexy Beast." > > Wasn't this part of the summer's argument regarding literals as > rdf:subjects , i.e. But: "Kingsley" film:isStarOf <#SexyBeast> . "Kingsley" film:isStarOf <#Ghandi> . is no more ambiguous than: <#SexyBeast> film:star "Kingsley" . <#Ghandi> film:star "Kingsley" . And what exactly is ambiguous about the following example? "2010-11-10"^^xsd:date d:precedes "2010-11-11"^^xsd:date . Whether an identifier is ambiguous and whether it's a literal are two mostly orthogonal issues. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 14:18:32 UTC