- From: Lars Heuer <heuer@semagia.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:02:26 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Hi Dave, [rdf:type returns 200] > Those are hash URIs, for example, the rdf:type expands to the URI: [...] > So those are perfectly fine. Ian's proposal and the discussion here has > been entirely about URIs without fragment identifiers, so called "slash > URIs". I see. Thanks :) Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com>
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 16:00:32 UTC