Re: Is 303 really necessary?

Hi Dave,

[rdf:type returns 200]
> Those are hash URIs, for example, the rdf:type expands to the URI:
[...]
> So those are perfectly fine. Ian's proposal and the discussion here has
> been entirely about URIs without fragment identifiers, so called "slash
> URIs".

I see. Thanks :)

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 16:00:32 UTC