- From: Jörn Hees <j_hees@cs.uni-kl.de>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:10:56 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On Thursday 04 November 2010, Ian Davis wrote: > On Thursday, November 4, 2010, Jörn Hees <j_hees@cs.uni-kl.de> wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > > > From your blogpost: > >> Under my new scheme: > >> GET /toucan responds with 200 and a representation containing some RDF > >> which includes the triples </toucan> ex:owner </anna> and </toucan> > >> ex:isDescribedBy </doc> > >> GET /doc responds with 200 and a representation containing some RDF > >> which includes the triple </doc> ex:owner </fred> > > > > So how can I then say that your description of toucan is wrong without > > saying that the poor toucan is wrong? > > Use the URI of the document /doc What about this statement in GET /toucan: </toucan> ex:owner </anna> As soon as anything comes back for </toucan> how am I to distinguish between that document and the toucan? Is that part of the toucan or of a description of toucan? Did you perhaps mean it to be included in </doc>? And: are there any other statements in /toucan allowed than ex:isDescribedBy? Jörn
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:11:35 UTC