Re: Is 303 really necessary?

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI with a 303 MAY be a NIR.
>
> Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR, in the sense that it is defeasibly taken to be an IR, unless this is contradicted by a self-referring statement within the RDF obtained from the URI.

Thank you for writing this - it's exactly what I mean.

Ian

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 15:13:03 UTC