W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:12:30 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTikAckyEdtBzd5oSB-twxZ1E6w2FQ_RFdOarLkA+@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI with a 303 MAY be a NIR.
> Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR, in the sense that it is defeasibly taken to be an IR, unless this is contradicted by a self-referring statement within the RDF obtained from the URI.

Thank you for writing this - it's exactly what I mean.

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 15:13:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC