- From: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:12:30 +0000
- To: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
- Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI with a 303 MAY be a NIR. > > Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR, in the sense that it is defeasibly taken to be an IR, unless this is contradicted by a self-referring statement within the RDF obtained from the URI. Thank you for writing this - it's exactly what I mean. Ian
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 15:13:03 UTC