- From: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 10:14:15 +0000
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>, public-lod@w3.org
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > Not necessarily. If you take your ex:isDescribedBy predicate and add > that to a triple store where the non-Information-Resource resources are > identified using hash URIs, then the SPARQL query is just: > > DESCRIBE <uri> ?res > WHERE { ?res ex:isDescribedBy <uri> . } > > which needn't be very slow. I've done this myself but using foaf:primaryTopic and foaf:topic to link a document URI to all the resources that are needed to render it. > >> The other downside of fragments is you can't say "it exists but I have >> no description of it". > > <#foo> a rdfs:Resource . > In which case you do have a description of it :) But point taken, this tautology would be enough. Cheers, Ian
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2010 10:14:48 UTC