W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 10:50:17 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD6CAB9.8070308@openlinksw.com>
To: Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen@gmail.com>
CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 11/5/10 3:34 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Hi Kingsley,
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Kingsley Idehen<kidehen@openlinksw.com>  wrote:
>> As a best practice, common use of these predicates would increase
>> navigability, link density, and overall cohesiveness of the burgeoning Web
>> of Linked Data. It would truly demonstrate practicing what we preach,
>> dog-food style!
> So you have some examples where these two specifications are used?
>
> Egon
>
Egon,

Seen this mail kinda late, hence late response. Some examples:

Links:

1. http://goo.gl/MG5iS -- shows a descriptor page, <link/>, and "Link" 
headers putting wdrs:describedBy to use
2. 
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1&p=12002 
-- rdfs:isDefinedBy and its effects .

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Sunday, 7 November 2010 15:50:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC