- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:14:24 +0000
- To: Lars Heuer <heuer@semagia.com>
- CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > [...] >>> Which solution gives less black spots? > >> fragments, with approx zero black spots (still to see a valid argument >> against them, vs more than i can list for non fragments) > > Maybe fragments are one solution. Maybe there isn't a problem to be solved when you use fragments - the only reason anybody is even discussing any of this is because people introduced a problem by not using fragments to identify things other than descriptions. > The Web isn't a bowl of cherries. k > The question might be: How to cover the Web practically? By listening to the rest of the web when they tell you that's a document/web-page/description and not a toucan, and that they're going to keep on calling it what it is regardless of what you say, perhaps. "It's a painting", "it's a pipe" - no it's a painting of a pipe, a visual description of a pipe if you will. description of a X - the description is a thing.
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 22:15:28 UTC