- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:44:14 +0100
- To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:22:09PM +0000, Ian Davis wrote: > Hi all, > > The subject of this email is the title of a blog post I wrote last > night questioning whether we actually need to continue with the 303 > redirect approach for Linked Data. My suggestion is that replacing it > with a 200 is in practice harmless and that nothing actually breaks on > the web. Please take a moment to read it if you are interested. cf. other discussion about RDF URI References and IRIs, where a resource is given an IRI that is not a valid URI as far as HTTP is concerned we can't dereference it properly so we need some kind of document -> description indirection... Though in general I think the best practice is only to give resources IRIs that are also valid URIs... Cheers, -w
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 15:44:43 UTC