- From: Lars Heuer <heuer@semagia.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:17:18 +0100
- To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Hi Ian, Even if I come from a slightly different camp (Topic Maps), I wonder if your proposal hasn't become reality already. Try to resolve rdf:type or rdfs:label: I think we agree that these resources describe abstract concepts and should not return 200 but 303. Both return 200. So, what we're talking about? The building bricks of RDF return 200 and everybody seems to happy with that fact. Why shouldn't other (non-addressable) information resources return 200 as well? Do I miss something? Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com>
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 10:53:39 UTC