W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: ANN: British National Bibliography

From: William Waites <ww@eris.okfn.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:50:26 +0100
To: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
Cc: "Deliot, Corine" <Corine.Deliot@bl.uk>, open-bibliography@lists.okfn.org, public-xg-lld@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org
Message-ID: <20101122165026.GS60158@styx.org>
* [2010-11-22 16:25:35 +0000] Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk> écrit:
] But is it reliable?  I looked up the book I wrote (Presenting XML, SAMS 
] Net, 1997) and find that it claims it was written by Laura Alschuler. 
] How did that happen?

That's what's in the source data, the 111443rd entry in BNBrdfdc12.xml

I have no idea the error rate for problems of this type in the data -
finding that out is a research project in itself. A next step is to
feed it through the link discovery tools at DERI and Berlin (are they
both the same (Silk) or is DERI's something different?) and then see
what kinds of inconsistencies we can find.

A bit easier, what we really need now is a good way to make these
corrections and feed them back into the BL. For the RDF clued like
yourself, I could take a patch in the form of a corrected graph and
put it in the store.

William Waites
9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A  E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 16:51:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:51 UTC