Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates

Hi,

On 5 November 2010 08:51, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:58 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
>> When you create hypermedia based structured data for deployment on an
>> HTTP network (intranet, extranet, World Wide Web) do include a
>> relation that associates each Subject/Entity (or Data Item) with its
>> container/host document. A suitable predicate for this is:
>> wdrs:describedBy [2] .
>
> Ian mentioned this predicate in his post.
>
> Looking at [1] the range of wdrs:describeBy is given as "class of POWDER
> documents and is a sub class of owl:Ontology" which seems to make it
> unsuitable as a general predicate for the purpose being discussed here.

Yes, I was going to point out the same thing and suggest that the FOAF
topic terms are a better fit (and already in use in a number of
places).

Cheers,

L.
-- 
Leigh Dodds
Programme Manager, Talis Platform
Talis
leigh.dodds@talis.com
http://www.talis.com

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 09:09:03 UTC