w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2005 by author

'Jason White'

• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)

Alan Chuter

• Re: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• Updated mapping of WCAG 1.0 checkpoints to WCAG 2.0 success criteria (Thursday, 30 June)
• Conformance Issues (Wednesday, 8 June)
• GL 2.5 Remaining 3 issues (Wednesday, 8 June)
• RE: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: [2.4] Proposal for guideline 2.4 (Wednesday, 4 May)
• GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: Agenda: 21 April 2005 (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Conformance Requirements proposal (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Definition of "baseline" (Friday, 8 April)

Andres Gonzalez

• RE: Screen Reader Supported Languages (Friday, 8 April)

Avi Arditti

• Re: Freedom of speech (Was RE: Another update to the proposal) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Bailey, Bruce

• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (Sunday, 26 June)
• RE: Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2 (Thursday, 23 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (Monday, 20 June)
• Should validity be P1 or P2? (was Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers) (Monday, 20 June)
• Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Thursday, 16 June)
• Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [Techs] Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy' (Monday, 11 April)

Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com

• Re: Agenda 6/30/05 - partial regrets (Thursday, 30 June)
• GL 1.3 issue summary against June 30 draft (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Agenda: 23 June Telecon - partial regrets (Thursday, 23 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (Wednesday, 15 June)
• [TECHS] Review of SC with respect to Scripting and baseline issues. (Monday, 6 June)
• Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2 (Tuesday, 31 May)
• [TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5 (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: JavaScript action example (Thursday, 12 May)
• [TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version (Monday, 2 May)
• {TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 (Monday, 2 May)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 27 April 2005 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• [TECHS] Possible Scripting Techniques with Guideline Mappings (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: Loretta's analysis of UAAG Guideline 9 (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: Guideline 4.2 Subgroup Report (Sunday, 24 April)
• re: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Sunday, 24 April)
• [TECHS] draft introduction to client side scripting techniques (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Example of baseline information included in HTML Technique 12.4 (Monday, 11 April)
• Example of baseline information included in HTML Technique 12.4 (Monday, 11 April)
• Example of Baseline information included in HTML Technique 5.11 (Monday, 11 April)
• RE: Screen Reader Supported Languages (Friday, 8 April)
• Screen Reader Supported Languages (Friday, 8 April)

Ben Caldwell

• checklist prototype (Thursday, 23 June)
• Guideline 1.3 SC (Wednesday, 22 June)
• content arranged in a sequence that affects meaning (Wednesday, 22 June)
• F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates (Thursday, 16 June)
• Proposals from June 13 Face to Face (Monday, 13 June)
• Updated Survey for 4.1 (Friday, 10 June)
• June 1 Draft (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 (with corrected guideline 2.2 survey link) (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Guideline 4.1 (use-spec) Issue Summary (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: Bugzilla down? (Monday, 23 May)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: [techs] Minutes of 11 May 2005 Techniques teleconference (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• Regrets for next week (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [TECHS] draft introduction to client side scripting techniques (Wednesday, 20 April)

boland@nist.gov

• Re: checklist prototype (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: Agenda Update: 2 June 2005 (Thursday, 2 June)
• RE: Text being imperceptible (allegedly) (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 June 2005 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 27 April 2005 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 25 April)

bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu

• NEW: Issue #1534 (Wednesday, 22 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #777 (Wednesday, 15 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #1259 (Wednesday, 15 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #659 (Wednesday, 15 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #1422 (Wednesday, 15 June)
• NEW: Issue #1533 (Saturday, 11 June)
• NEW: Issue #1531 (Friday, 10 June)
• NEW: Issue #1530 (Friday, 10 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #503 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #478 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• NEW: Issue #1528 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• NEW: Issue #1529 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #1355 (Tuesday, 7 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #965 (Saturday, 4 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #1501 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #802 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #1225 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #1500 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• CLOSED: Issue #1457 (Saturday, 28 May)
• NEW: Issue #1526 (Saturday, 21 May)
• CLOSED: Issue #180 (Friday, 20 May)
• NEW: Issue #1525 (Thursday, 19 May)
• NEW: Issue #1523 (Wednesday, 4 May)
• NEW: Issue #1524 (Wednesday, 4 May)
• NEW: Issue #1521 (Thursday, 28 April)
• NEW: Issue #1522 (Thursday, 28 April)
• NEW: Issue #1520 (Saturday, 23 April)
• NEW: Issue #1509 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1519 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1515 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1510 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1495 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1494 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1504 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1506 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1499 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1500 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1514 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1497 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1518 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1490 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1502 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1501 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1498 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1493 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1513 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1507 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1512 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1511 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1489 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1517 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1516 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1491 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1503 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1496 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1488 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1487 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1508 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1505 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1492 (Thursday, 7 April)
• NEW: Issue #1486 (Thursday, 7 April)

Carlos A Velasco

• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Thursday, 26 May)

Chris Ridpath

• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Need for exemptions for teaching materials, samples, multilingual documents (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Test files review, #75, 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183 (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Monday, 11 April)

Christophe Strobbe

• Start time of WCAG telecon (was:Re: Agenda 6/30/05) (Thursday, 30 June)
• GL 2.2 issue summary (close/clarify/not addressed) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Monday, 20 June)
• Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates) (Friday, 17 June)
• GL 2.2: updated proposals (Wednesday, 15 June)
• GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Sunday, 5 June)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Wednesday, 25 May)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Tuesday, 24 May)
• GL 2.2 proposals and issue summary (Tuesday, 24 May)
• regrets for 5 May telecon (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Regrets for 27 & 28 April telecons (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Saturday, 23 April)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Thursday, 21 April)

David Dorward

• Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) (Thursday, 23 June)
• XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics] (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (Monday, 20 June)
• HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics] (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages) (Monday, 25 April)
• Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages) (Monday, 25 April)

David MacDonald

• remove validity completely? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• test (Tuesday, 21 June)
• perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Tuesday, 21 June)
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Saturday, 18 June)
• RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• 1.4 background sound (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Input for F2F on Guide and general techniques (Thursday, 9 June)
• RE: [TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5 (Tuesday, 24 May)
• late regrets: (Friday, 20 May)
• [tech] 4.2 Summary (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow) (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow) (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow) (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips (Wednesday, 27 April)
• List of HTML Techniques not affected by baseline and list of affected (Wednesday, 13 April)
• HTML Techniques16.1, 10.6 baseline Discussion (Wednesday, 13 April)
• RE: Test files review, #75, 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183 (Tuesday, 12 April)
• RE: [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Thursday, 7 April)
• [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Tuesday, 5 April)

Doyle-Work

• Early Regrets - April 28th (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Conformance Claims - W3C Logo Use (Friday, 1 April)

Gez Lemon

• Re: checklist prototype (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Reasons to move validity back to P1 (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates) (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Thursday, 16 June)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= (Monday, 27 June)
• FW: Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2 (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Not over til its over - hang in there whatever your view(s). (Wednesday, 22 June)
• a note on voluntary standards and policy related standards (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Saturday, 18 June)
• Done - Revisited (Friday, 17 June)
• Over (Thursday, 16 June)
• FW: 4.2 notes/proposals (Thursday, 16 June)
• 2.3 Guideline revisions proposal (Thursday, 16 June)
• 2 levels or 3 (Thursday, 16 June)
• Over (Thursday, 16 June)
• 9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Issue Summary 1.4 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• * Can we Start 1 hour early for Thursday call???? (Tuesday, 7 June)
• RE: Level 3 (Monday, 6 June)
• RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Monday, 6 June)
• RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Sunday, 5 June)
• RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Sunday, 5 June)
• Provide Feedback on Straw poll forms (Thursday, 2 June)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Saturday, 28 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• points to Ponder (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility) (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2 (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2 (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• 3.1 REQUIRING NON-TEXT ALTERNATES TO TEXT (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= (Wednesday, 25 May)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Tuesday, 24 May)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Tuesday, 24 May)
• RE: [TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5 (Tuesday, 24 May)
• RE: Ill-defined terms in WCAG 2 (Monday, 23 May)
• RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2 (Wednesday, 18 May)
• ISSUE SuMMARY for 2.3 Avoiding Content that provokes siezures (Tuesday, 17 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Tuesday, 10 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Sunday, 8 May)
• RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• User agent assumptions - vs - baseline (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes (Tuesday, 3 May)
• The next WCAG WG face-to-face will be in Brussels 13-16 June (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Sunday, 1 May)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Sunday, 1 May)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Sunday, 1 May)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of content) (Thursday, 28 April)
• non-text content (Thursday, 21 April)
• issue 1214. 2.4: 1194.22-like SC should be level 1 [21] (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: Definition of "baseline" (Saturday, 9 April)
• RE: Definition of "baseline" (Saturday, 9 April)
• RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: Background audio (was: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes) (Friday, 1 April)

Ineke van der Maat

• Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: Another update to the proposal (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Saturday, 28 May)
• Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: 3.1 comments (Thursday, 5 May)

info@lucamascaro.info

• Re: checklist prototype (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: R: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Tuesday, 14 June)
• double regrets (Thursday, 28 April)

Isofarro

• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: [script-techs] Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [script-techs] Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Wednesday, 20 April)
• [Fwd: Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation] (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Wednesday, 20 April)

Jason White

• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 27 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Level 3 (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Definition of "semantics" (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Responses to comments on GL 3.1 proposal (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: 3.1: Proposal with several updated SC (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: "Accessibility features" (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: Outside expert opinion on Web standards and WCAG (especially GL 1.3) (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: "Accessibility features" (Tuesday, 24 May)
• RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2 (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) (Friday, 13 May)
• Declaring educational level (Friday, 13 May)
• Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: working definition of baseline (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Sunday, 1 May)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Saturday, 30 April)
• RE: Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes (Saturday, 30 April)
• Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Friday, 29 April)
• Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: Need for exemptions for teaching materials, samples, multilingual documents (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [Techs] Divide Techniques docs into chapters? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy' (Sunday, 10 April)
• RE: Definition of "baseline" (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: Definition of "baseline" (Saturday, 9 April)
• RE: Unifying ATAG and UAAG in 4.2 (or surrogate) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Definition of "baseline" (Thursday, 7 April)
• Correction (Re: Issues and proposals: conformance claims) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Definition of "baseline" (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: Issues and proposals: conformance claims (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Regrets for this week (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: Background audio (was: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes) (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes (Friday, 1 April)

Jenae Andershonis

• RE: _Tech] Release date for Mac screen reader (Thursday, 14 April)

Jens Meiert

• Validity and Well-formedness (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Definition of "semantics" (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Definition of "semantics" (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Definition of "semantics" (Sunday, 12 June)
• Re: Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility) (Friday, 27 May)
• WAI CSS and WCAG conformance pages (was: W3C style sheet fix (needed for WCAG conformance pages)) (Monday, 25 April)
• HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries) (Monday, 25 April)

Jim Ley

• Re: [Techs-scripting]FW: setting focus on a form field using javascript (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Tuesday, 19 April)

Joe Clark

• Web Standards Project Accessibility Task Force (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: remove validity completely? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2 (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: [techs] examples for techniques requirements document (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Definition of "testable" (was: Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd) (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Sunday, 19 June)
• Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Definition of "semantics" (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Definition of "semantics" (Monday, 13 June)
• Definition of "semantics" (Sunday, 12 June)
• RE: Level 3 (Saturday, 11 June)
• RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Monday, 6 June)
• RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Sunday, 5 June)
• Text being imperceptible (allegedly) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility) (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2 (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: 3.1: Proposal with several updated SC (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Further articles documenting the sense of "semantics" (Monday, 23 May)
• Outside expert opinion on Web standards and WCAG (especially GL 1.3) (Monday, 23 May)
• Ill-defined terms in WCAG 2 (Monday, 23 May)
• "Accessibility features" (Monday, 23 May)
• Items to keep in mind for Principle 3: "Content and controls must be understandable" (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: [minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: move proposed SC to GL 1.3? (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: addition proposal, GL 4.2 (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) (Friday, 13 May)
• Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) (Thursday, 12 May)
• JavaScript action example (Thursday, 12 May)
• RE: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs (Wednesday, 11 May)
• (1.3) Validation and semantics recap (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: [TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs (Wednesday, 4 May)
• RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 2 May)
• RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2) (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [techs] Techniques for Guideline 1.3 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Tuesday, 26 April)
• RE: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages) (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 25 April)
• Unicode encodings (Friday, 22 April)
• One model for validation of JavaScript (vaguely related to 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation") (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: non-text content (Thursday, 21 April)
• IRC log isn't what we're talking about (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Regrets for Techniques Teleconference 20 April 2005 (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Issue summary for 1.3: "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 18 April)
• Need for exemptions for teaching materials, samples, multilingual documents (Monday, 18 April)
• Unifying ATAG and UAAG in 4.2 (or surrogate) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files. (Thursday, 7 April)

Johannes Koch

• Parsing and extracting information (valid or not) (Thursday, 23 June)

John M Slatin

• Reminder: Call starts early today (Thursday, 23 June)
• RE: content arranged in a sequence that affects meaning (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Introduction: Updated version (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Agenda: 23 June Telecon (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd) (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• FW: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Another resource re: testability of WCAG2.0 guidelines and success criteria (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Draft Introduction to WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005 (Tuesday, 7 June)
• RE: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages (Tuesday, 7 June)
• 3.1: Action item re foreign passages (Tuesday, 7 June)
• 3.1: Another update (Tuesday, 7 June)
• RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) (Monday, 6 June)
• Agenda: 13-16 June meeting in Brussels (Friday, 3 June)
• RE: Text being imperceptible (allegedly) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Agenda Update: 2 June 2005 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Agenda: 2 June 2005 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary (Wednesday, 1 June)
• 3.1: Another update to the proposal (Wednesday, 1 June)
• RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Responses to comments on GL 3.1 proposal (Wednesday, 25 May)
• 3.1: Proposal with several updated SC (Tuesday, 24 May)
• [4.1] Article on when to create custom DTD's (and when not to) (Friday, 20 May)
• Agenda + Announcement: 19 May 2005 (Wednesday, 18 May)
• RE: [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item (Monday, 16 May)
• RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) (Friday, 13 May)
• RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, (Friday, 13 May)
• Agenda addendum: link to proposed SC for GL 1.3 (Thursday, 12 May)
• Why 2GL .4 isn't on the agenda this week (Thursday, 12 May)
• Agenda update: 12 May 2005 (Thursday, 12 May)
• RE: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs (Wednesday, 11 May)
• RE: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Agenda: 12 May 2005 (Tuesday, 10 May)
• [Techs] Regrets for Wednesday (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: (1.3) Validation and semantics recap (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Monday, 9 May)
• RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• Stevie Wonder does music video with audio description (Friday, 6 May)
• [Techs-scripting]FW: setting focus on a form field using javascript (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: 3.1 comments (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Wednesday, 4 May)
• 3.1 Issue summary (Wednesday, 4 May)
• RE: [TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Agenda: 5 May 2005 (Wednesday, 4 May)
• 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs (Wednesday, 4 May)
• RE: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 2 May)
• RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 2 May)
• Sign language video (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Functional text content) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of functionality) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of content) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (ASCII art) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 8) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" (Thursday, 28 April)
• FW: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Wednesday, 27 April)
• RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" (Wednesday, 27 April)
• [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" (Wednesday, 27 April)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Agenda: 28 April 2005 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• RE: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages) (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages) (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries) (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Sunday, 24 April)
• RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Sunday, 24 April)
• RE: UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary (Saturday, 23 April)
• RE: Wendy's analysis of UAAG Guideline 6 (Saturday, 23 April)
• RE: Loretta's analysis of UAAG Guideline 9 (Saturday, 23 April)
• [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Saturday, 23 April)
• Please comment on issue summaries (Saturday, 23 April)
• Definition of information (was RE: non-text content) (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Friday, 22 April)
• [Techs]Window-Eyes info for matrix (Wednesday, 20 April)
• [Techs] JAWS info for matrix (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Dublin Core Accessibility element (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Agenda (updated) for Thursday 21 April (Wednesday, 20 April)
• FW: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Wednesday, 20 April)
• RE: UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Agenda: 21 April 2005 (Wednesday, 20 April)
• RE: Issue summary for 1.3: "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Strange behavior of mail archive? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Monday, 18 April)
• Guide doc: resend of Wendy's HTML-Techs mockup (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Guide doc: Drafts to discuss on Thursday (Thursday, 14 April)
• Agenda correction: Today's call starts same time as always (Thursday, 14 April)
• _Tech] Release date for Mac screen reader (Thursday, 14 April)
• [Techs] Divide Techniques docs into chapters? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• RE: Test files review, #75, 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183 (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Guide doc: Drafts to discuss on Thursday (Wednesday, 13 April)
• More info about new JAWS 6.10 features (Friday, 8 April)
• FW: [techlunch] JAWS 6.10 Free Update for 6.0 Users Released (Friday, 8 April)
• Overview of "baseline" (was re: Definition of baseline)def of baseline (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Issues and proposals: conformance claims (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Tuesday, 5 April)
• RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes (Friday, 1 April)

kerstin

• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)

lguarino@adobe.com

• Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Agenda: 23 June Telecon (Wednesday, 22 June)
• regrets, June 2 (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: "Accessibility features" (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: [minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: move proposed SC to GL 1.3? (Monday, 23 May)
• GL 4.2: Revised modification to the conformance section (Monday, 16 May)
• addition proposal, GL 4.2 (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• working definition of baseline (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 2 May)
• Requiring ATAG conformance (Monday, 2 May)
• Re: RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• Fwd: Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2) (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2 (Tuesday, 5 April)

Li, Alex

• 3.2 Proposal version 2 (Friday, 10 June)
• RE: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages (Wednesday, 8 June)
• RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary (Wednesday, 1 June)
• RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary (Wednesday, 1 June)
• GL 3.2 proposal and summary (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Bugzilla down? (Monday, 23 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: Agenda: 5 May 2005 (Wednesday, 4 May)

Lisa Seeman

• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Sorry about double posting (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: 3.1: Another update to the proposal (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs (Tuesday, 10 May)
• regrets (Tuesday, 10 May)
• 3.1 comments (Wednesday, 4 May)
• overview of 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs (Wednesday, 4 May)
• programmatically determined (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Please comment on issue summaries (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Proposed planning framework (Wednesday, 20 April)
• imporved accessibility metadata paper (Wednesday, 13 April)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• GL 4.2 Issues Summary (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: GL 3.2 proposal and summary (Tuesday, 24 May)
• move proposed SC to GL 1.3? (Friday, 13 May)
• changing state and value programmatically (Friday, 13 May)
• Baseline definition (Thursday, 12 May)
• Revised Proposal, GL 4.2 (Wednesday, 4 May)
• RE: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Issues summary, GL 4.2 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Loretta's analysis of UAAG Guideline 9 (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Wendy's analysis of UAAG Guideline 6 (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Wendy's analysis of web applications vs user agents (Tuesday, 19 April)
• UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Guideline 4.2 Subgroup Report (Tuesday, 19 April)

Luca Mascaro

• RE: regrets, Agenda 6/30/05 (Thursday, 30 June)
• RE: regrets for today's call (06/23) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Why is important require well-formed, validity and richness in XHTML by examples (Saturday, 18 June)
• RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Thursday, 16 June)
• regrets (Tuesday, 10 May)
• about semantical use of markup (Thursday, 5 May)

Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -

• Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= (Thursday, 30 June)
• Late Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= (Friday, 10 June)
• Regrets: Agenda: 2 June 2005 (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= (Thursday, 26 May)
• Late regrets for 28 April 2005 call (Friday, 29 April)
• Regrets: Agenda (updated) for Thursday 21 April (Thursday, 21 April)

Matt May

• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: 2 levels or 3 (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Level 3 (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: Requiring ATAG conformance (Monday, 2 May)

Maurizio Boscarol

• Re: Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?... (Thursday, 23 June)
• Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?... (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Sunday, 19 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)

Michael Cooper

• Proposed ednote to clarify captions and transcript (Thursday, 23 June)
• Need 1.1 L1 SC basic requirement to provide text alternative (Thursday, 23 June)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 June 2005 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005 (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Agenda for Techniques portion of Face to Face, 15 - 16 June 2005 (Tuesday, 7 June)
• [techs] Minutes for 01 June Techniques teleconference (Wednesday, 1 June)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 June 2005 (Tuesday, 31 May)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 May 2005 (Tuesday, 24 May)
• RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2 (Wednesday, 18 May)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 May 2005 (Tuesday, 17 May)
• [techs] Minutes of 11 May 2005 Techniques teleconference (Wednesday, 11 May)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 11 May 2005 (Tuesday, 10 May)
• RE: working definition of baseline (Tuesday, 10 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Tuesday, 10 May)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 May 2005 (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [techs] requirements updated (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [techs] Please review issue summaries (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [techs] Review of techniques issues for Guideline 2.4 (Monday, 2 May)
• [techs] Changes in requirements doc (Wednesday, 27 April)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 27 April 2005 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [techs] Updated requirements for techniques and checklists (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [techs] Techniques for Guideline 4.2 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [techs] Techniques for Guideline 2.4 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [techs] Techniques for Guideline 1.3 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [techs] Techniques for Guideline 1.1 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [techs] minutes from April 20 telecon (Thursday, 21 April)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 06 April 2005 (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Analysis, impact of externalized baseline decision on techniques (Tuesday, 5 April)

Mike Barta

• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, (Friday, 13 May)
• RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: Unicode encodings (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes (Friday, 1 April)
• RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes (Friday, 1 April)

Neil Soiffer

• Regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005 (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: Agenda: 21 April 2005 (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Thursday, 7 April)

Neil Whiteley

• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Tuesday, 21 June)
• RE: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy' (Sunday, 10 April)
• RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes (Friday, 1 April)

Richard Ishida

• RE: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Wednesday, 20 April)

Roberto Castaldo

• Regrets: Agenda 6/30/05 (Thursday, 30 June)
• Regrets: Agenda: 23 June Telecon (Thursday, 23 June)
• R: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Thursday, 23 June)
• R: R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Tuesday, 21 June)
• R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 20 June)
• R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Sunday, 19 June)
• R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Sunday, 19 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Thursday, 16 June)
• Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= (Friday, 10 June)
• Regrets: Agenda: 2 June 2005 (Friday, 3 June)
• Regrets: Agenda 19 May 2005 (Thursday, 19 May)
• Regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005 (Thursday, 12 May)
• Regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005 (Thursday, 28 April)
• Late regrets: Agenda for Thursday 21 April (Friday, 22 April)
• Regrets: Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Thursday, 14 April)
• Regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Thursday, 7 April)

Roberto Ellero

• regrets, Agenda 6/30/05 (Thursday, 30 June)
• regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005 (Thursday, 26 May)
• Regrets for today's call (05/19) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Late regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005 (Friday, 13 May)
• regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 (Thursday, 5 May)
• regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005 (Thursday, 28 April)
• regrets: Agenda Thursday 14 April (Thursday, 14 April)
• regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Thursday, 7 April)

Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

• Regrets: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= (Thursday, 30 June)
• RE: remove validity completely? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: test (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics] (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Sunday, 19 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Thursday, 16 June)
• RE: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Tuesday, 14 June)
• RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005 (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy' (Sunday, 10 April)

Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

• R: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda (for Luca Mascaro) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Regrets for this evening (R. Scano and L. Mascaro) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: addition proposal, GL 4.2 (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 (Thursday, 5 May)
• Triple Regrets: Agenda (updated) for Thursday 21 April (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: HTML Techniques16.1, 10.6 baseline Discussion (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Unifying ATAG and UAAG in 4.2 (or surrogate) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Definition of "baseline" (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Definition of "baseline" (Thursday, 7 April)
• Regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Wednesday, 6 April)

Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC

• RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers (Tuesday, 14 June)

Sailesh Panchang

• &#9830;Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 11 May)

Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)

• 06/30 call (Thursday, 30 June)
• regrets for today's call (06/23) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re : Influence of valid code (generically) (Friday, 17 June)
• regrets for today's call (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Regrets for today's call (05/19) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Regrets for 12 May 2005 call (Thursday, 12 May)
• Late regrets for 28 April 2005 call (Thursday, 28 April)
• regrets for 4/20 call (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Thursday, 14 April)
• Regrets for Thursday 7 April 2005 conference (Wednesday, 6 April)

Tim Boland

• Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= (Thursday, 30 June)
• Fwd: [Proposed Recommendation] QA Specification Guidelines (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Multiple definitions for "baseline" (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Another resource re: testability of WCAG2.0 guidelines and success criteria (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Draft Introduction to WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Proposals from June 13 Face to Face (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Level 3 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Issue Summary 1.4 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Tuesday, 31 May)
• RE: 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• (very minor) addition to 25 May 2005 WCAG TTF minutes? (Friday, 27 May)
• possible regrets for Thursday plus suggestion? (Wednesday, 18 May)
• [techs] regrets for Wednesday's WCAG TTF call (Monday, 16 May)
• [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: Agenda: 12 May 2005 (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Fwd: Test Development FAQ released (Wednesday, 11 May)
• RE: RE: working definition of baseline (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• Fwd: [PUBLICATION] QA Specification (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (Monday, 2 May)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Monday, 25 April)
• Regrets for next week for me also (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Definition of "baseline" (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Issues and proposals: conformance claims (Wednesday, 6 April)

Tina Holmboe

• Re: Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?... (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Saturday, 18 June)

Tom Wright

• Re: [script-techs] Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [script-techs] Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation (Thursday, 21 April)

Vicente Luque Centeno

• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Thursday, 16 June)
• About tests 37-41 (headers) (Wednesday, 15 June)
• About test 13 (client side image-maps) (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility (Wednesday, 15 June)
• WCAG formalization (rewriting WCAG HTML techniques as automatable rules) (Wednesday, 15 June)

WATANABE Takayuki

• Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Regrets (RE: Agenda: 23 June Telecon) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Late Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= (Friday, 10 June)
• Regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Regrets for this evening (Thursday, 19 May)
• late Regrets: Agenda update: 12 May 2005 (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs (Thursday, 12 May)
• Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: Regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005 (Thursday, 28 April)
• Regrets: Agenda (updated) for Thursday 21 April (Thursday, 21 April)
• Regrets: Agenda: Thursday 14 April (Thursday, 14 April)
• Regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005 (Thursday, 7 April)

webmaster@w3.org

• YOUR PASSWORD HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY UPDATED (Tuesday, 14 June)

Wendy

• Protected message (Thursday, 23 June)
• Changes.. (Tuesday, 14 June)
• RE: Protected message (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Hello (Monday, 30 May)

Wendy A Chisholm

• [minutes] 23 june 2005 telecon (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Need 1.1 L1 SC basic requirement to provide text alternative (Thursday, 23 June)
• [techs] examples for techniques requirements document (Wednesday, 22 June)
• testing (no need to respond, still testing archives) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• testing (no need to respond, testing archives) (Wednesday, 22 June)

Wendy Chisholm

• Re: Start time of WCAG telecon (was:Re: Agenda 6/30/05) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Updated survey for Guideline 2.5 (Friday, 10 June)
• Updated survey for guideline 3.1 (Friday, 10 June)
• Updated: 9 June 2005 Agenda (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Issue summary for the guidelines document in general (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Updated proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Wednesday, 8 June)
• [techs] [Fwd: ACCESSKEY heats up] (Friday, 3 June)
• [minutes] 2 June 2005 telecon (Thursday, 2 June)
• [minutes] 26 May 2005 telecon (Thursday, 26 May)
• [minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 19 May)
• [minutes] 28 April 2005 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 29 April)
• [minutes] 27 April Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 27 April 2005 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: non-text content (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: issue 1214. 2.4: 1194.22-like SC should be level 1 [21] (Friday, 22 April)
• [minutes] 21 April 2005 telecon (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Resend of planning example (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 20 April 2005 (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Proposed planning framework (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Strange behavior of mail archive? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [minutes] 13 April 2005 TTF telecon (Thursday, 14 April)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 13 April 2005 (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: [Fwd: RE: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy'] (Monday, 11 April)
• Issues and proposals: conformance claims (Wednesday, 6 April)
• [minutes] 31 March 2005 telecon (Friday, 1 April)

www.ec.com.cn

• 《EC商务周刊-资讯版》(2005年第22期 总第54期) (Friday, 17 June)

Yvette Hoitink

• [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Wednesday, 20 April)
• [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Monday, 18 April)
• Probable regrets (RE: Agenda 6/30/05 =======================) (Thursday, 30 June)
• [2.4] Issue summary (Thursday, 30 June)
• RE: Proposed ednote to clarify captions and transcript (Friday, 24 June)
• Regrets (RE: Agenda: 23 June Telecon) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Draft Introduction to WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 20 June)
• RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers (Friday, 17 June)
• RE: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates (Friday, 17 June)
• [2.1] Guideline summary and new proposal (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Reminder: straw poll for 2.4 (Friday, 3 June)
• [1.3] Alternative proposal for guideline text (Thursday, 2 June)
• Freedom of speech (Was RE: Another update to the proposal) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• [2.4] New proposal for guideline 2.4 (Tuesday, 31 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Agenda + Announcement: 19 May 2005 (Thursday, 19 May)
• Regrets (RE: Agenda update: 12 May 2005) (Thursday, 12 May)
• RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Thursday, 5 May)
• RE: [2.4] Proposal for guideline 2.4 (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [2.4] Proposal for guideline 2.4 (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) (Friday, 29 April)
• [1.1] Proposal for new example (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Agenda: 28 April 2005 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• [2.4] Proposals for 2.4 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• RE: HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries) (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries) (Monday, 25 April)

Yvette P. Hoitink

• RE: Unifying ATAG and UAAG in 4.2 (or surrogate) (Thursday, 7 April)
• WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy' (Saturday, 9 April)
• RE: Background audio (was: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes) (Friday, 1 April)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2005 20:45:43 UTC