- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:32:57 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B012482C7@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
Wendy proposes: <blockquote> functionality Proposed definition: Performing or able to perform an action in response to user input. </blockquote> I'm not sure about this one-- it seems more like a definition of "functional" than of "functionality." For example, you can substitute the definition for the word "functional" in 1.1 L1 SC1: For non-text content that performs or is able to perform an action in response to user input. If we want to accept the definition, we might consider changing 1.1 L1 SC1 slightly, replacing "is functional" with "provides functionality" or "has functionality" John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ <http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/>
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:33:01 UTC