- From: <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:33:07 -0700
- To: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I'll be half an hour late. Loretta ----- Original Message ----- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu> Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 8:21 pm Subject: Agenda: 23 June Telecon > > Note: > We will again be starting one hour earlier than usual. > Meeting Information > 1900 UTC 0500 Eastern Australia 1500 North American Eastern 1200 > Pacific 1900 Central Europe > Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 Passcode 9224# > IRC server: irc.w3.org port : 6665 channel : #wai-wcag > > > Goal of meeting: > Review proposals from Brussels meeting and approve publication of > PublicWorking Draft on 30 June > > Prior to the call: > 1. Please review the 16 June Editor's Draft at > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/06/f2f-proposed-resolutions-draft.html. > This draft includes more than 50 changes agreed upon by > participants in > the Brussels meeting through noon on Thursday, 16 June. Changes > includenew guideline text, new wording for success criteria, > deletion of some > success criteria, and changes in levels to which success criteria are > assigned. New definitions for important terms such as text > alternative,non-text content, and others are also included. This > draft does not > include proposed wording for several guidelines which were > discussed on > Thursday afternoon, after several participants had had to leave; those > proposals are available in the survey listed below. > a. Please send your comments about the Editor's Draft to the list > *before* the call. These comments will help us focus discussion during > the call. They will also help us craft Editorial Notes describing > unresolved issues for inclusion in the draft. Editorial Notes > frame the > issues and encourage more targeted feedback from reviewers. > > Please complete the survey for the remaining proposals from the > Brusselsmeeting. The survey is available at > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/misc0621/ > 2. The survey focuses on specific success criteria within the > following guidelines: > > a. GL 1.2 > b. GL 2.3 > c. GL 2.4 > d. GL 4.2 > e. Number of conformance levels > 3. The call will result in the text of the new Public Working Draft > that we will publish on June 30. The new public draft will also > includeEditorial Notes describing issues for which the Working > Group has not > yet achieved resolution. These Editorial Notes will inform the Web > community about possible directions we are considering, and request > comments and suggestions from reviewers. > > Agenda > 1. Agenda overview (5 minutes) > 2. Techniques Task Fore (5 minutes) > 3. Review results of surveys listed above (50 minutes): > a. Accept or reject proposed wording > b. Identify unresolved issues to be described in Editorial Notes > included in the new Public Working Draft > 4. Review of Editor's Draft (90 minutes) > a. Accept or reject proposed wording for inclusion in Public > Working Draft > b. Identify issues that should be described in Editorial Notes and > included in Public Working Draft > 5. Informative content: (30 minutes) > a. Determine what informative content should be published in > support of new Public Working Draft > i. Introduction (informative section of Guidelines doc) > ii. Client-side Scripting Techniques > iii. HTML and XHTML Techniques > iv. CSS Techniques > v. Checklist > vi. Guide doc > > > > "Good design is accessible design." > > Dr. John M. Slatin, Director > Accessibility Institute > University of Texas at Austin > FAC 248C > 1 University Station G9600 > Austin, TX 78712 > ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 > email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu > Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:33:18 UTC