- From: (unknown charset) Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:04:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: (unknown charset) David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- cc: (unknown charset) w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:04:22 UTC
> I was given the task to review tests that apply to the object tag. #75,
> 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183.
Do you really mean test *suites*? Because we have those.
<http://www.student.oulu.fi/~sairwas/object-test/>
> In general I have a problem with tests that are designed to pass a certain
> accessibility principle but are inaccessible in other respects.
Such as?
No captions on multimedia? What?
> Can we not create passing test files that are WCAG compliant in other
> respects.
Do you refer to using object and embed in valid HTML?
<http://joeclark.org/access/captioning/bpoc/embed-object.html>
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
--This.
--What's wrong with top-posting?
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:04:22 UTC