- From: (unknown charset) Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:04:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: (unknown charset) David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- cc: (unknown charset) w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:04:22 UTC
> I was given the task to review tests that apply to the object tag. #75, > 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183. Do you really mean test *suites*? Because we have those. <http://www.student.oulu.fi/~sairwas/object-test/> > In general I have a problem with tests that are designed to pass a certain > accessibility principle but are inaccessible in other respects. Such as? No captions on multimedia? What? > Can we not create passing test files that are WCAG compliant in other > respects. Do you refer to using object and embed in valid HTML? <http://joeclark.org/access/captioning/bpoc/embed-object.html> -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> --This. --What's wrong with top-posting?
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:04:22 UTC