- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:54:25 -0500
- To: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Joe writes: <blockquote> So you want 24-hour talk-radio stations to spend millions of dollars every year posting transcripts several days after the fact? </blockquote> No. Look at Example 8 in Wendy's proposal, please. "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joe Clark Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:43 pm To: WAI-GL Subject: Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) > It's just audio. So it's not covered by GL 1.2. It would > be covered by GL 1.1 L1 SC2, which requires a text transcript for > *audio > only* in my view (not for multimedia, which *is* covered under 1.2. So you want 24-hour talk-radio stations to spend millions of dollars every year posting transcripts several days after the fact? How does this enhance accessibility? Ask around. Online radio stations are not a priority for deaf people. Video is. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> --This. --What's wrong with top-posting?
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:54:28 UTC