W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)

From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:30:17 +0200 (MEST)
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <23948.1119357017@www82.gmx.net>


Validity should be P1. It is not demanded too much.

> This thread refers to "valid" code and I'm not sure everyone has the
> same definition.

Valid code conforms to a DTD/schema. Well-formedness is dixi-daxi.


-- 
Jens Meiert
Information Architect

http://meiert.com/

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 12:30:23 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Dorward: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?"
Previous message: Gez Lemon: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)"
In reply to: Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)"
Next in thread: David Dorward: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?"
Reply: David Dorward: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:32:26 UTC