- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:58:04 +0200
- To: <befree@magma.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "David MacDonald"<befree@magma.ca> Inviato: 22/06/05 22.32.35 A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Oggetto: remove validity completely? In the 2.0 guidelines "we" (and I use the term referring to the entire committee *and* those influencing the committee) have shifted from a W3C technology centric document to a set of standards that should apply to any technology... Roberto: Right! Sgml is not W3C. David: I don't know if there is a validator out there for every language that might be used on the web... When I look up "validate pdf" (and its related phrases) in Google or in the Help files in Acrobat, all I get is information on how to open up a secure digitally signed document. So the question comes up...is "validity" a testable concept for all non-w3c technologies. Roberto: It is inside Adobe Acrobat. For other document that specify a dtd is possible to use markup validators. David: Requiring validation may turn our document back into a "only use W3C technologies" type of document. That's fine with me if that's what we want, but I don't think that is what we want. If we leave validity out, then the W3C technology itself requires validity. Roberto: The requirement is not w3c-centered. Or we can changed with: "When a markup language is used, its structure must be public declared and respected"
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 21:58:24 UTC