- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:06:49 -0500
- To: "'Gez Lemon'" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yes - if you post it to the list tonight the working group will most certainly read it before our meeting tomorrow. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Gez Lemon > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 2:39 AM > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! > > > Hi John, > > On 22/06/05, John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu> wrote: > > The only "foregone conclusion" is that we will publish a new public > > working draft on 30 June. > > It seems I may have read too much into the "we". I can't make the > Thursday teleconference, but would like to make a case for my position > on validity. If I put together a summary of my concerns in relation to > the rationale from the face-to-face, and send it this evening when I > get back from work, could it be considered at the teleconference > tomorrow? > > Best regards, > > Gez > > -- > _____________________________ > Supplement your vitamins > http://juicystudio.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:06:58 UTC