- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:58:28 +0200
- To: <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Always regarding 4.1: <cite> Level 1 Success Criteria for Guideline 4.1 SGML-based delivery units are well-formed. [I] Note: This does not require that they are valid. Non-SGML-based delivery units are formatted according to their content type specification. [I] </cite> Why only sgml-based languages can be not Valid? ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Ben Caldwell"<caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Inviato: 16/06/05 20.26.28 A: "WCAG-WG"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Oggetto: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates Hello, The proposed resolutions resulting from the 13-16 June face to face meeting have been incorporated into an updated Editors draft. The URI for the draft with proposed changes is: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/06/f2f-proposed-resolutions-draft.html> I've also updated the history of changes page to include a summary of the proposed changes: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/change-history.html> Please send comments and questions regarding these proposals to the list. Please note that the draft may still need some additional cleanup given the number of changes that were made in such a short period of time. I'll be doing some proofreading early next week to clean up any errors that I spot, but please let me know if you notice any in review. All the best, -Ben -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 18:58:50 UTC