- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:41:02 +0200 (CEST)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 18 Jun, Luca Mascaro wrote:
> About this thematic, why we don't ask an officially opinion to HTML WG?
I just wonder what, exactly we should ask them? Whether or not invalid
code, triggering "let's guess at what the REAL structure should be"
mode in user-agents, have an impact on accessibility?
Following the discussion over the last days has left me confused.
Invalid code - in particular invalid markup - does, to a greater or a
lesser extent, influence how a user-agent - ANY user-agent - parse and
"perceive" the structure and semantics[*] of a document.
That influence clearly impact upon accessibility - to some degree.
Guessing what is, and isn't, rarely give rise to good handling of
information.
So what do we ask them?
[*]
This is a classic, real life, example:
<p>
First part of the paragraph goes here.
<hr>
Second part of the paragraph goes here.
</p>
Error-correcting the above leaves the information - logically *one*
piece - split into *two*. By no means a major problem, but still a
problem; and one which might, given the right circumstances, be an
accessibility hazard.
--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies
tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/
[+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Saturday, 18 June 2005 11:41:09 UTC