- From: <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 15:56:20 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
One of the proposals made for GL 4.2 was to include ATAG conformance for authoring applications: [5] authoring applications (part of conformance?) <proposal> Web applications that are created for the sole purpose of assisting users to create content intended for publication on the web must conform to at least Level A of the ATAG 2.0 Guidelines. </proposal> In looking at the most recent ATAG 2.0 draft, it appears that ATAG requires WCAG conformance: <ATAG Guideline> 1.1 Ensure that the authoring interface follows applicable software accessibility guidelines. [Authoring Interface Checkpoints Relative to WCAG or Authoring Interface Checkpoints Relative to ISO-TS-16071] Rationale: If the authoring interface does not follow these guidelines, people with disabilities may not be able to author Web content. Techniques: Implementation Techniques for Checkpoint 1.1 Success Criteria: The authoring tool must satisfy at least one of the following conditions: (a) At least one full-featured Web-based authoring interface must always conform to WCAG. (b) At least one full-featured non-Web-based authoring interface must always conform to ISO-TS-16071. </ATAG Guideline> So adding this requirement introduces a mutual dependency between the guidelines. Can we do this, or does this introduce an infinite recursion?
Received on Monday, 2 May 2005 22:56:58 UTC