- From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:19:06 -0500
- To: WCAG-WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <42937E2A.2080201@trace.wisc.edu>
Attached is my summary of issues related to guideline 4.1. Most of the issues that remain seem to be intertwined with our decisions around baseline and guideline 1.3. We have received mixed feedback recommending that we both strengthen and weaken the current level 1 requirement to pass validity tests and use elements and attributes as defined in the spec. At this point, I'm interested in feedback about how people feel about the consequences of strengthening and or weakening this guideline based on the proposals I've made under issue #888. To facilitate discussion, I think it would be helpful to have a more complete list of examples where it is particularly important that authors be allowed to violate a spec for backward compatibility or compatibility with AT as well as examples of cases where the consequences of spec violations negatively impact end users. All the best, -Ben -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu
Attachments
- text/html attachment: 4.1-bugs-2005-05-23.html
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 19:20:09 UTC