As I have explained on this list before, it is unnecessary to be so very specific and brand-conscious in our guidelines as to require Unicode encoding. We merely need to require a declared and correctly-used encoding. Anyway, I asked Michael Everson and John Hudson if any of the currently-used Web encodings contained characters that Unicode does not, and they both answered no. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> --This. --What's wrong with top-posting?Received on Friday, 22 April 2005 17:17:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:39 UTC