Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call from Ineke van der Maat on 2005-05-27 (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2005)

From: Ineke van der Maat <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 18:29:36 +0200
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <017901c562d9$45bf08e0$0201a8c0@inekem>

Hello Greg,

You wrote;
> If they do not want to do this - they do not have to.  And I can see no
> conditions under which phantasy sites would ever be required to conform to
> Level 3.   So it is just guidance on what to do if you want to.
>

Because all my pages, including my phantasy-poems,  now conform to wcag-AAA. 
And why should not that be possible with wcag 2.? And I assume i am not the 
only one who is writing phantasy-poems and conform to WCAG 1.0-AAA now.

greetings
Ineke van der Maat

Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 16:29:41 UTC