- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:51:43 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <20050622145144.055DE1CC3E5@m14.spamarrest.com>
A voluntary standard is written with one set of assumptions - and these assumptions affect how the working group words and structures the standard. Standards that may be enforced or referenced in regulations operate under a different set of assumptions and must be worded and structured with this in mind. Citing a voluntary standard in a way that would be mandatory (required for conformance) in another standard that may be regulated must be done with great care - or it may violate some of the assumptions made when the voluntary standard was created. It should only be done if all of the provisions in the voluntary standard have been walked through with the idea of mandating them in mind. Also important in doing the walk through would be the interpretation of what is "Valid" - and whether that means passing a validator or it means using all aspects of the standard exactly as documented in the voluntary standard. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:51:54 UTC