- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:11:53 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At today's teleconference, Becky raised a question about the following proposed success criteria: [8] New GL 2.1 Level 1 SC <proposal> The states and values of contents that can be changed via the user interface can also be changed programmatically. </proposal> She asked whether providing event handlers for the relevant events would satisfy this requirement, or whether a special API would be needed specifically to change the states and values. I took an action to trace the origin of this proposal back to our analysis of UAAG. It stems from Wendy's analysis of UAAG Guideline 6 [1]: "6.1 Programmatic access to HTML/XML infoset (P1)* This checkpoint refers to the XML infoset [1]. Seems to me as long as an author uses any XML-based language according to spec, they will have provided all info according to the infoset and therefore the UA will have the info needed to satisfy provisions 1 and 2. Provision 3 says, "If the user can modify the state or value of a piece of HTML or XML content through the user interface (e.g., by checking a box or editing a text area), allow programmatic read access to the current state or value, and allow the same degree of write access programmatically as is available through the user interface." Here, the author needs to provide state or value information if the user agent is unable to determine state or value. It seems that the DHTML roadmap is helping ensure, "allow the same degree of write access programmatically as is available through the user interface" but I'm not sure what that means for the author." My reading of this is that html and xml user agents will provide this support automatically, but someone with better understanding of those user agents should confirm. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0162.html
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 01:12:06 UTC