W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:42:59 +0100
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050621124259.GB21758@us-lot.org>


On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:30:17PM +0200, Jens Meiert wrote:

> Well-formedness is dixi-daxi.

What does dixi-daxi mean?

-- 
David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 12:43:04 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tina Holmboe: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)"
Previous message: Jens Meiert: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)"
In reply to: Jens Meiert: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)"
Next in thread: Jens Meiert: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?"
Reply: Jens Meiert: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:40 UTC