Re: checklist prototype

Thanks - great job.   Is this checklist meant to be part of a WCAG2.0 
conformance claim (supporting documentation for such a claim)?   If so, should 
there be a column indicating "not satisfied" as well as a "satisfied" column 
in the checklist?  I think maybe "satisfied" column should be presented after 
the SC description but before the "comments" columan for a particular SC?   
For "Levels" text, could there be a link to the relevant text in the main 
WCAG2.0 WD rather than restating this text again in this checklist?   Also, 
L1, L2, and L3 SCs are all "lumped" together under a specific guideline, but 
should it be noted in "introduction" that not all SC levels may need to be 
satisfied for a particular guideline to claim conformance, depending on 
whether conformance is claimed at A, AA, AAA, etc.?    This checklist seems 
similar to what is called an Implementation Conformance Statement (ICS) from 
QASpecGL..

Best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

PS - Thanks to all those creating the surveys.   I've found it to be a useful
and productive work paradigm..

Quoting Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>:

> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've put together a prototype checklist [1] for discussion at tomorrow's 
> meeting. Still some work to do on the CSS, but the content is all there, 
> so decided not to hold it up any longer.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Ben
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/06/checklist-proto.html
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 11:57:22 UTC