On 21/06/05, Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com > Thus, I can live with a requirement at level 1 that my code > is well-formed - that is good coding practice and can help > accessibility. I can not live with a requirement for > completely VALID code at level 1. That doesn't make sense for SGML languages like HTML, or are we redefining the meaning of well-formed? Everyone seems to have the same definition for valid - it's what we consider "little" errors that's causing disagreement. > If the requirement for valid code that conforms to a DTD is required > at Level 1, I would not be able to use the DHTML roadmap to create > a more accessible page! That's what I thought the get out clause was for, or is the get out clause not applicable at level 1? Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.comReceived on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 11:47:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:32:26 UTC