- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:33:31 -0500
- To: "Ineke van der Maat" <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>, "Yvette Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
An exchange between Yvette and Ineke: <blockquote> > If we do want a success criterion about spoken versions of text, I > think > we > should include that it has to be the user's choice, i.e.: "The user can > select a spoken version of text content" or something similar. I really think to skip the whole requirement is the best way. When users want to listen to text, they only need to put on their screenreaders </blockquote> I agree with Yvette. In proposing that a spoken version of the text be provided, I always *assumed* (but did not specify) that it would be available to users *in addition to* the text version, and that users would be free to listen to it or not. However, the proposal is not aimed at people who have screen readers (after all, listening to the text would be the default for them). The proposal aims to help sighted users who have disabilities that limit their ability to read text. Specifically, there are certain disabilities such as dyslexia that affect phonological processing-- an inability to convert written characters to the proper auditory form.However, many people with dyslexia are able to understand very complex materials when those materials are read aloud. John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ineke van der Maat Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 11:50 am To: Yvette Hoitink Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Hello Yvette, You wrote: > If we do want a success criterion about spoken versions of text, I > think > we > should include that it has to be the user's choice, i.e.: "The user can > select a spoken version of text content" or something similar. I really think to skip the whole requirement is the best way. When users want to listen to text, they only need to put on their screenreaders. Also for other platforms than windows screen readers are developped the last time. Advantage also: users can always have the same settings they are used to. greetings Ineke van der Maat
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 17:33:40 UTC