W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:29:02 +0100
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050623082902.GA607@us-lot.org>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:37:09AM +0100, Gez Lemon wrote:
> > However, that doesn't answer my question. Why XHTML 1.1 (as text/html)
> > and NOT 1.0 + Appendix C?
> A more pertinent question would be why XHTML 1.0 + appendix c?

I can't think of any reason for it (although I do it myself as a
legacy from my old XHTML fanboy days - I haven't gotten around to
implementing a filter in my CMS to convert it back to HTML 4.01 yet),
but at least it is a "MAY be served as text/html" rather than "SHOULD
NOT be served as text/html".

David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 08:29:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:40 UTC