- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 15:19:57 -0400
- To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
During the call last Thursday, somebody complained that my rewrite of
1.3 to require the use of accessibility features of a technology was
ambiguous. Which technology? And what if there aren't any for that
technology?
If this is such a contentious concept, why is it already in 4.2?
>Level 2 Success Criteria for Guideline 4.2
>
> 1. Accessibility conventions of the markup or programming language
> (API's or specific markup) are used. [I]
If memory serves, WAI has spent a lot of time documenting the
accessibility features of various technologies. None of this is a
crazy new concept.
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 19:23:35 UTC