- From: <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 11:57:25 -0700
- To: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> - In regard to the second item of the discussion, I believe that the > point is not whether you use Unicode or not, but whether you use a > character set whose specification is open so AT manufacturers can > implement it. Following the same line of arguments into other sections > of WCAG, we could say that some well-known proprietary formats can > never be made accessible, since they are not "standard." I think the requirement is that alternate encodings be a public specification, not necessarily an open specification. That is, there needs to be a well-defined way to get to the characters.
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 18:58:11 UTC