- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:01:03 -0500
- To: "Tim Boland" <frederick.boland@nist.gov>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B01351AA5@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
Tim has located several possible definitions for the terms "technology" and "techniques" which appear in the techniqures requirements document. Definition of "Technology" Since the Working Group reached consensus on a definition of "technology" on the 4 May call, one option (as Tim notes) is to use the same definition in the Requirements document: <blockquote> technologydef1 - A definition from the WCAG2.0 Glossary [2] "a markup or programming language, application programming interface (API), or communication protocol". Do we want to keep this same definition in [1] for consistency? </blockquote> Yes! Definitions and usage should be consistent across the set of documents for WCAG 2.0. Definition of "techniques" As for the term "techniques," I think we use it in *both* senses (2) and (3) below: <blockquote> technniquesdef2 - Another definition from dictionary.com [5] "a method or body of methods for accomplishing a desired end" technniquesdef3 - In ATAG2.0 Glossary [6], "techniques" are defined as "informative suggestions and examples for ways in which the success criteria of a checkpoint might be satisfied" </blockquote> The individual techniques conform to the first definition quoted above: each one offers a method of accomplishing a desired end. The techniques *documents* (HTML Techniques, Client-Side Scripting, etc.) conform to the definition as it appears in the ATAG 2.0 glossary: the techniques documents contain "informative descriptions and examples of methods and bodies of methods that may be used to satisfy particular success criteria" I suggest that the WCAG 2.0 Glossary define the word "technique" as "a method or body of methods that may be used to satisfy the success criteria defined in WCAG 2.0" This definition should also be used in the Requirements document. I also propose that we describe the techniques *documents* as providing informative descriptions and examples of methods thta may be used to satisfy success criteria defined by WCAG 2.0" I don't think the latter belongs in the Glossary, but it does belong in the Requirements document, and it might also be used in the introductory section of WCAG 2.0, for example in the section on "How to Read this Document" where we list the various documents and types of documents that make up the WCAG 2.0 collection. JOhn "Good design is accessible design." Dr. John M. Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu Web <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/> http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim Boland Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:18 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item My action item from the May 11 WCAG TTF teleconference was to propose definitions for terms "technology" and "techniques" used in the "Requirements for WCAG2.0 Checklists and Techniques" Document [1]. In fulfillment of that action item: Proposed "technology" Definitions (identified as "technologydef"): technologydef1 - A definition from the WCAG2.0 Glossary [2] "a markup or programming language, application programming interface (API), or communication protocol". Do we want to keep this same definition in [1] for consistency? technologydef2 - A definition from dictionary.com [3] "the application of science, especially to industrial or commercial objectives", or "the scientific method and material used to achieve a commercial or industrial objective" technologydef3 - Another definition from dictionary.com [3] "the practical application of science to commerce or industry", or [3] the "discipline dealing with the art or science of applying scientific knowledge to practical problems" technologydef4 - Still another definition from [4] "the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular area" NOTE: The previously-mentioned proposed "technology" definitions have different nuances which may or may not be important for WCAG work. What are the preferences of WG members for which "technology" definition should be included in [1]? --------------------------end of proposed "technology" definitions--------- Proposed "techniques" Definitions (identified as "technniquesdef"): technniquesdef1 - A definition from dictionary.com [5] "the systematic procedure by which a complex or scientific task is accomplished technniquesdef2 - Another definition from dictionary.com [5] "a method or body of methods for accomplishing a desired end" technniquesdef3 - In ATAG2.0 Glossary [6], "techniques" are defined as "informative suggestions and examples for ways in which the success criteria of a checkpoint might be satisfied" technniquesdef4? - In SpecGL Section 1.5.1 [7], "techniques" are mentioned to "illustrate basic (and non exhaustive) questions or methods to help realize the Requirement/Good Practice and produce specification text", although there is no definition for "techniques" currently in the SpecGL Glossary. NOTE: The previously-mentioned proposed "techniques" definitions have different nuances which may or may not be important for WCAG work. What are the preferences of WG members for which "techniques" definition should be included in [1]? Since "techniques" are referenced in multiple W3C specifications, I think it would be good to use a common definition across W3C WGs if possible.. --------------------------end of proposed "technniques" definitions--------- [1]: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-wcag2-tech-req-20050503.html> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-wcag2-tech-req-20050503.html [2]: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/#glossary> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/#glossary [3]: <http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=technology> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=technology [4]: <http://63.240.197.92/cgi-bin/mwdictaj?technology> http://63.240.197.92/cgi-bin/mwdictaj?technology [5]: <http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=technique> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=technique [6]: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ATAG20-20041122/#definitions> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ATAG20-20041122/#definitions [7]: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/
Received on Monday, 16 May 2005 18:46:04 UTC