- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:16:17 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <20050527181616.C004A60C14E@m18.spamarrest.com>
We sometimes have had animated posts to other's proposals on the list. Please remember that 1. a post to the list (by anyone including the chair) does not necessarily represent the view of the group as a whole unless it is posted as a consensus statement. 2. Consensus means that "everyone can at least live with it." It doesn't mean everyone thinks it great. 3. we adopt or agree on a lot of language because it is better than what we had and we think we need something - not because we like the new language that much 4. this is all still in formulation until we get to the end 5. some of this is much rougher than other parts 6. proposals are just that and fail as often as they pass. * Don't get too worried about a proposal - or map its approach to the full group. It is just one person * Just post concerns and suggestions for improvement. 7. there are proposals and parts of the current doc that bother each person on the Working Group (though they may be different). 8. No one is upset about someone posting a concern or problem with their proposal or any proposed wording. The Working Group members do it themselves all the time. not infrequently they post them against things they wrote themselves earlier. Just do it gently. This is tough enough as it is. Thanks much Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 18:16:22 UTC