- From: Doyle-Work <dburnett@sesa.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 08:37:58 -0900
- To: W3C Web Content <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Interestingly, after our audio conference, yesterday, I did a little research on conformance claims with respect to web sites that boast the W3C HTML 4.01 validation logo. I did the following: I used Google and typed into the search field, valid-html401 (the file name I had for the validation logo)...that search yielded some 17,000 plus results. The majority of the results with, "valid-html401" happened to be web statistics pages that had the file name in text form but did not actually show the logo. There were also a good number of chat forums that had that file name somewhere in their text but not the logo. It took awhile but I identified 75 sites that used the logo and of the 75 tested, only 7 did not validate. I ONLY looked at how the sites validated by using W3C's HTML validation tool and did NO human testing. Doing human testing would have no doubt yielded different results - let's hope not too different. Two things come to mind: 1. The majority of sites using the logo really are actually conforming (again, without the human testing we really do not know). But, this seems a good initial sign. 2. The numbers of hits on Google or any other search engine will be misleading with regard to the actual number of sites using the logo as a means to display W3C validation. Again, the good news is that most sites (given my VERY small sample) will likely validate. Doyle Doyle Burnett Education and Training Specialist Multiple Disabilities Program Special Education Service Agency dburnett@sesa.org Www.sesa.org --
Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 17:42:51 UTC