W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Proposals from June 13 Face to Face

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:07:27 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

In the updated internal working draft mentioned following, is there any 
consideration for addressing deprecation/evolution of features between 
WCAG1.0 and WCAG2.0, in a manner described in [1]?  Possibly as part of 
Appendix C of updated internal working draft?

Also, in "Conformance" section of updated internal working draft, with 
subheading "Content that conforms to WCAG 1.0", last sentence of the 
paragraph following subheading, what does it mean, in a measurable sense, 
for a delivery unit to be modified in a "significant" way?    What is 
determined as being "significant"?   What is the difference between a 
"delivery unit" and a "full delivery unit"?  I think that this particular 
sentence does not flow well with the two previous sentences contained 
within the quotes, as currently constituted..

I wish everyone a productive meeting.. Best wishes to you..

Tim Boland

[1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005May/0079.html

At 05:47 PM 6/13/2005 -0500, you wrote:

>This morning, I published an updated internal working draft that reflects 
>all of our resolutions through the 9 June telecon. It is available at:
>As we worked through open issues for various guidelines today, I developed 
>an updated editor's draft that reflects the proposed changes resulting 
>from our discussions. So far, we've worked our way through all of the 
>guidelines in principles one and two and guideline 3.2.
>The URI for the draft with proposed changes is:
>I've also updated the history of changes page to include a summary of the 
>proposed changes:
>I will be updating these drafts during the course of the week with new 
>proposals as we continue to work through the open issues and editorial notes.
>Please send comments and questions regarding these proposals to the list. 
>We are also drafting a "punch list" of open issues with guidelines and 
>success criteria that we will be working to address before the next public 
>draft and will be posting that to the list soon.
>Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
>Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 14:09:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:40 UTC