W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:38:02 -0500
To: "'WAI-GL'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20050527153802.4764E1CC3D9@m14.spamarrest.com>

It does reduce the incentive.  But authors will not be in a position to make
dictionaries for a language.   This is a necessary limitation.  This does
not say that people should not create dictionaries of specialty words that
they create etc.  


 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----  On Behalf Of Jason White

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:59:07PM -0500, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> If online dictionaries do not exist for a language then it is not 
> required to conform - or conforms automatically however you want to look
at it.

I understand the intent behind this, but the effect is not to create any
insentive to make online dictionaries, glossaries etc., available, even if
the entity creating the content is in a position to do so.
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 15:38:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:39 UTC