- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:14:03 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <200504071514.j37FE3wW001980@mail4.magma.ca>
I was given the task to review tests that apply to the object tag. #75, 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183. I am in the middle of the assessments and will be finishing them before our call today. But there is something that I have to get clear on. In general I have a problem with tests that are designed to pass a certain accessibility principle but are inaccessible in other respects. I realize that there is a disclaimer above the test files saying that they may contain accessibility problems peripheral to the issue being tested, but I still have a problem with an inaccessible file getting a "passing" grade. I think it gives a confusing message to web designers. If the tests were only being looked at by machines it would not be as important to me, but when humans look at these tests I think it gives a mixed message. Can we not create passing test files that are WCAG compliant in other respects. If not I would dump inaccessible test files that are supposed to pass a certain WCAG criteria, unless they are not going to be looked at by humans. David MacDonald …access empowers people… …barriers disable them… www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com/>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 15:14:10 UTC