- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:03:02 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
If the group answers "yes" to the question in excerpted message following, then I think it should be clearly stated in WCAG 2.0 exactly how, by satisfying WCAG 1.0-AAA, an offerer would satisfy all WCAG 2.0 Level 3 success criteria (that is, such conformance should be expressed in WCAG2.0 terminology and in terms of the WCAG2.0 conformance model). I'm not aware of a definition of "automatic" conformance in QA SpecGL Glossary [1] (although definitions of "conformance", "conformance clause", and "strict conformance" are provided). Please access QA SpecGL Requirement 06 - "create conformance labels for each part of the conformance model" [2] for more information; possibly other QA SpecGL requirements and best practices are relevant as well. Perhaps there are also some other WCAG2.0 "conformance clause" and "applicability" issues pertaining to possible use of WCAG1.0, if conformance to WCAG1.0 is being used to claim conformance to WCAG2.0. Please access QA SpecGL Requirement 01 - "include a conformance clause" [3] and QA SpecGL Requirement 02 - "define the scope" [4] for more information; possibly other QA SpecGL requirements and best practices are relevant as well. Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#glossary [2]" http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#conf-label-principle [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#include-conformance-clause-principle [4]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#define-scope-principle >>1 - should someone who conforms to WCAG 1-AAA automatically >> conform to WCAG 2-Level 3 ?? >
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:03:47 UTC