- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:42:48 -0400
- To: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
The Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0 WD is currently being "reworked", with the current proposal having Guidelines Part A: make the authoring interface accessible, and Guidelines Part B: support the production of accessible content. WCAG is referenced normatively as the determinant of what constitutes accessible Web content. in the "reworking" of ATAG2.0 WD.. At 09:24 AM 6/7/2005 -0500, you wrote: >The current internal/editor's draft contains the following Editor's note >about this (the wording of the note was agreed at the July 2004 f2f in >Redwood Shores [1]): > ><blockquote cite="http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/"> >Editor's Note #2: We are currently looking at how to handle unknown or >community-contributed, authored units that are created using an >aggregator >supplied tool. If the aggregator-supplied tool conforms to > >ATAG, can ATAG conformance be used to imply that the aggregated content >conforms to WCAG? ></blockquote>
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 15:44:12 UTC