W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:29:39 +0200
To: <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200506220127156.SM01608@Inbox>

Hi John, i cannot partecipate this week in teleconference but i would like if possible to register my position against guideline that we are discussing. I will write my position also in the survey.

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "John M Slatin"<john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
    Inviato: 22/06/05 5.42.17
    A: "Gez Lemon"<gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
    Gez wrote:
    We? I feel excluded. Has everyone agreed on this, or this an
    inner-circle we?
    I'm sorry you feel excluded.  The "we" here refers to participants in
    the WCAG Working Group, and in particular those who were able to attend
    the face to face meeting in Brussels last week.  As stated prior to that
    meeting, any resolutions adopted at the face to face meeting are have
    been sent to the WCAG mailing list for discussion, and will be reviewed
    again at this Thursday's teleconference/meeting of the Working Group. If
    participants in good standing accept the proposal, it will be included
    in the new public Working Draft to be published on 30 June. If the
    Working Group does not reach consensus, the 30 June draft will include
    an Editorial Note describing the issues and requesting feedback from the
    Web community.
    The Working Group is grateful for the extended discussion of this issue
    over the past several days, which has come both from participants in the
    Working Group and from people in the Web community who are passionately
    interested in and committed to making the Web more accessible.
    The only "foregone conclusion" is that we will publish a new public
    working draft on 30 June.
    I recognize that this particular issue is extremely important.  However,
    there are 12 other guidelines and more than 60 success criteria. The Web
    community would be well served by responses to other guidelines and
    success criteria in the proposed draft as well.
    Thanks again for all the energy and thought devoted to this important
    "Good design is accessible design."
    Dr. John M. Slatin, Director 
    Accessibility Institute
    University of Texas at Austin 
    FAC 248C 
    1 University Station G9600 
    Austin, TX 78712 
    ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 
    email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu 
    Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility 
    -----Original Message-----
    From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
    Behalf Of Gez Lemon
    Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 4:36 PM
    To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
    Subject: Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
    On 21/06/05, David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca> wrote:
    > The only reason we have it in at P2 (rather than leaving it to the
    We? I feel excluded. Has everyone agreed on this, or this an

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 05:30:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:40 UTC