- From: Yvette Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:27:10 +0200
- To: "'WAI GL \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Issue summary for guideline 2.4 1. Issues that are closed Issue 1387 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1387] can be closed because the original poster thought it was a problem that the current phrasing covers search functions as well, which is exactly what we want. I propose to explain this to the original poster and close this issue. Issue 1388 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1388] was addressed by the proposal for guideline 2.4 level 1 success criterion 1 adopted at the 9 June 2005 meeting [http://www.w3.org/2005/06/09-wai-wcag-minutes.html]. This new proposal removes the overlap with 1.3 which was the original concern. Issue 1389 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1389] was addressed by deleting guideline 2.4 level 2 success criterion 1 (Documents that have five or more section headings and are presented as a single delivery unit include a table of contents with links to important sections of the document) as decided at the 9 June 2005 meeting [http://www.w3.org/2005/06/09-wai-wcag-minutes.html]. This removes the word 'document' from guideline 2.4 which the original poster found unclear. 2. Issues that seem to be closed, but may need clarification Issue 1132 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1132] may be addressed by the proposal for guideline 3.1 level 3 SC 5 adopted at the June 14, 2005 meeting in Brussels [http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html]. Unsure because this only addresses a part of the concern of the original poster. The notion of progressive complexity is not covered by the current proposal. I feel this belongs in the guide for either 2.4 or 3.1. I think this issue can be closed once it is incorporated there. 3. Issues that are not addressed in current draft Issue 955 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=955] is not addressed by the current proposal. However, I feel providing information about presentation modes belongs in the techniques documents so this issue can be closed once this has been incorporated into techniques. I will submit this as a technique. Yvette Hoitink Heritas, Enschede, the Netherlands E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl WWW: http://www.heritas.nl
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2005 09:27:19 UTC