- From: Yvette Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:06:27 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
John Slatin wrote: > > <blockquote> > Joe writes: > <blockquote> > So you want 24-hour talk-radio stations to spend millions of > dollars every year posting transcripts several days after the fact? > > </blockquote> > > Sorry: my first response was stupid and I apologize. > > The answer, though, is that *if* a 24-hour talk radio station > archives its broadcasts and posts them to the Web, and *if* > that station wants to claim conformance to WCAG 2.0, then > yes, I want them to post transcripts. It's do-able. NPR > does it. Voice of America does it. > > I know those aren't 24-hour talk radio stations. > Nevertheless, I do think those transcripts should be required > *if* the station wants to claim conformance. > I agree with John here. We're setting the bar for what's accessible. Radio broadcasts without transcripts aren't accessible, and our guidelines shouldn't allow them to claim otherwise. But that doesn't mean we require talk radio stations to transcribe everything. It's up to policy makers to decide which content should conform at which level: for example 10% of broadcasts need to conform to at least level 1. For a 24-hour talk radio station, it might be that only their news items are transcribed and the rest of their broadcasts are not made accessible. This could explained in a conformance statement where the majority of the broadcasts are scoped out. Yvette Hoitink Heritas, Enschede, the Netherlands E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl WWW: http://www.heritas.nl
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 10:06:44 UTC