- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:18:56 -0500
- To: "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gez wrote: <blockquote> It seems I may have read too much into the "we". I can't make the Thursday teleconference, but would like to make a case for my position on validity. If I put together a summary of my concerns in relation to the rationale from the face-to-face, and send it this evening when I get back from work, could it be considered at the teleconference tomorrow? </blockquote> Thanks, Gez. We'll do our best to compile responses and take them into account on the call tomorrow. John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 2:39 am To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Hi John, On 22/06/05, John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu> wrote: > The only "foregone conclusion" is that we will publish a new public > working draft on 30 June. It seems I may have read too much into the "we". I can't make the Thursday teleconference, but would like to make a case for my position on validity. If I put together a summary of my concerns in relation to the rationale from the face-to-face, and send it this evening when I get back from work, could it be considered at the teleconference tomorrow? Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:19:04 UTC