RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call

> But the fact that the Web site you mention above does a poor job of
> implementing existing accessibility guidelines isn't necessarily an
> argument against a success criterion.  There are thousands of sites that
> have terrible alt text for their images, but that's not a reason to
> strike down the requirement to provide alt text.

Because alt text is part of the HTML spec and is unambiguously under 
author control. Reading a textual Web page out loud is a user-agent issue.

-- 

     Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
     Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
       --This.
       --What's wrong with top-posting?

Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 18:40:25 UTC