- From: Mike Barta <mikba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:11:13 -0700
- To: "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Agree. Authors cannot actually publish in Unicode for the most part but
in UTF-8, 16, etc. which are encodings. As long as the content uses an
encoding that is a registered standard then we should be ok with it.
KOI8 and UTF-8 will both yield Unicode Russian chars once the agent
interprets them. And no, klingon is not an encoding despite what the
fan club might think -- unless the author knows for a fact this is only
going to said fan club, since in that case his baseline includes that
encoding.
/m
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Clark
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:18 AM
To: WAI-GL
Subject: Unicode encodings
As I have explained on this list before, it is unnecessary to be so very
specific and brand-conscious in our guidelines as to require Unicode
encoding. We merely need to require a declared and correctly-used
encoding.
Anyway, I asked Michael Everson and John Hudson if any of the
currently-used Web encodings contained characters that Unicode does not,
and they both answered no.
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
--This.
--What's wrong with top-posting?
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:11:18 UTC